This research
will develop and evaluate a framework to enhance stakeholder acceptance
of bioremediation technologies. The research protocol includes four
closely related components. First, we will test a framework for stakeholder
participation that prescribes appropriate stakeholder involvement strategies
based on stakeholders' trust of the other parties involved in technology
deployment decision-making. Second, we will assess conflict among stakeholders
regarding the acceptability of in situ bioremediation as a means to
reduce risks posed by radionuclides and metals in the environment. Third,
we will assess the role that awareness of risk exposure plays in the
willingness of stakeholders to engage in problem-solving and making
risk tradeoffs. Fourth, we will assess the potential of using the results
of these first three components to forge consensus among stakeholders
regarding the use and oversight of bioremediation technologies and stakeholder
involvement in the decision process.
This project
is designed to identify the range of concerns held by the public about
different bioremediation strategies for in-situ clean up at Department
of Energy sites. We propose to use an interdisciplinary team of sociologists
and environmental engineers to work together with members of the public
and other experts to test our hypothesis that “recreancy”
– the perceived failure of an organization to exhibit technical
competency and fiduciary responsibility – helps explain public
perceptions of risks associated with bioremediation. Two primary methods
will be used to collect data. First, a “consensus conference”
will be conducted with a panel of lay members who will work with panel-identified
experts to articulate their concerns about bioremediation in general,
and at the specific study site (Idaho National Engineering and Environmental
Laboratory). Using information from the consensus conference, a structured
survey will be created and administered via computer-aided telephone
interview (CATI).