1998 RESEARCH PROJECTS
Bioremediation and Its Societal Implications and Concerns (BASIC)



PROJECT:

Communicating Effectively with NABIR Stakeholders

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:

Gordon Bilyard

PROGRAM ELEMENT

BASIC

This project will help stakeholders understand the NABIR program and its value by developing communications protocols that scientists can use when they engage NABIR stakeholders. Those stakeholders include citizens, regulators, technology developers, science and technology users, Congress, Native Americans, local officials, environmental groups, and public interest groups. This primary project goal will be accomplished by communicating information about the NABIR program to Hanford Site stakeholders, and to selected stakeholders across the DOE complex. Specific objectives during FY98 are to 1) educate stakeholders about NABIR research and development efforts on the Hanford Site and nationwide, and solicit opinions about the scope and technical direction of laboratory and field programs; 2) engage and solicit opinions from stakeholders about NABIR activities that could be conducted on the Hanford Site; and 3) educate Hanford stakeholders and elicit their concerns about field testing that could occur if the Hanford Site is selected as a Field Research Center. This information will be used to develop a representative picture of stakeholder issues for the NABIR program. It will also be used to develop protocols that NABIR scientists can use to help them communicate effectively, develop trust, and establish viable long-term partnerships with stakeholders across the DOE complex. This project will, in the words of Neal Lane (Director, National Science Foundation), help "carry our understanding of science and its value into the lives of all Americans" (Science, February 23, 1996).


PROJECT: The Determinants of Social Acceptability of Genetically Engineered Microorganisms for Bioremediation
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Amy K. Wolfe
PROGRAM ELEMENT BASIC

OBJECTIVE: Genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) potentially can reduce the costs of responsibly treating many of the nation's most vexing remediation problems to a fraction of currently projected costs. Whether or not these technologies actually find their way into practical application depends on the willingness of society to accept their potential costs relative to their promised benefits-the metric of social acceptability.

APPROACH: The proposed project will identify and analyze the determinants of social acceptability of using GEMs for bioremediation. More specifically, the project will undertake a three-stage process -- a literature review, a case study of the first field application of GEMs for bioremediation in the United States, and a simulation exercise -- to accomplish the following goals:

Develop a generic model of the kinds of issues of most importance to each of several prototypical constituency groups involved in the dialogue that accompanies the social acceptability of new and controversial technologies;

Test and refine that model through a case study of the field application of GEMs and a simulation exercise; and

Suggest the kinds of responses (provide data, provide information about the decision-making process, etc.) that may be most appropriate in public dialogues that seek to resolve the issues raised.


[Back to Award Recipients Page]